While I
filch Norman Mailer’s title, I should really change the plural to the singular,
since I have only a single theme in mind: my recent Kindle book, A
Sailor Writes Home from His Time in the U.S. Navy: Letters of 1945-1946,
Aftermath of World War II. As I mention in its introduction, I
discovered those letters quite recently when I finally looked into a box that I
had taken home from my mother’s apartment after she passed away. My father, a
super-orderly person, had collected the letters I had written home from my year
in the Navy and carefully preserved them in temporal order. He never told me
that he had done this.
I was
delighted to find those letters, only occasionally typed, so, with some help,
put them into canonical Word form and, with a few illustrations, brought them
out as a Kindle book, now available on Amazon1. People who have
dipped into my blog now and then are probably aware of all that.
During
the time between my discovery of the letters and the collection’s publication,
I read them of course. But not really. I read them with a view to putting them
into a book—to see what translation was needed, since chunks were written in
German, to determine where identifying notes were called for, and the like. I
did not really read them just for what they were, not to mention think about
them or evaluate them as examples of prose.
After
the book was out, my friend David Brown suggested that I select some of the
letters and follow up with brief accounts as to what happened to topics raised
in 1954-46 in the years afterwards. To implement that idea, I read quite a few
of the letters for the first time carefully. Somewhat to my surprise, that led
me to gain considerable respect for those epistles, noting how varied were the
topics taken up and especially about the quality of the prose of a kid just out
of high school. I even wondered whether more might have been made of them had
the set come out just after the end of the war, instead of as relics nearly
seventy years later.
What,
in a way, I found out is that I already brought something to the writing
courses I took in college. Besides taking the not-very-memorable required
writing course from a not-remembered instructor, I signed up for an elective
taught by Professor Quentin Anderson, then just an assistant professor. We had
to write an essay every week, not a long one, on a topic of our own choosing.
Anderson’s comments were often quite cryptic, pronounced in a basso profundo voice while he looked out
of the window to his left rather than at our small class. You might say that
Quentin didn’t teach us anything.
Nevertheless, I think I learned a lot that semester, just in writing those
weekly essays. That course was also my first conscious experience that you
learn to write by writing, a message I have preached in my later role as
teacher, together with the strong advice to think of several drafts of anything
that matters—a maneuver greatly facilitated by the computer.
As a
college senior I took a seminar with Jacques Barzun on fin de siècle history that called for writing two major papers. I
profited a lot from Jacques’ comments, quite a few of which were very practical
writing suggestions. But I benefited even more from the fact that he arranged
to get one of those seminar papers published, giving me my first publication!
Now in
my old age, I am prepared to say that writing is the only one of the activities
that I have been engaged in that I
would claim to do at a professional level, and that just limited to expository
prose. My computer contains more than one sketch on what it is to be an
amateur. I have wanted to become clearer on that subject because I think of
myself to be an amateur or if you prefer the less favorable label, a
dilettante. I’ve been an amateur woodworker, especially in turning a great many
bowls, trays, and candlesticks on the lathe; that activity was later
transformed into a quite extensive career as a wood sculptor; I was an amateur
art collector that led to a collections of prints by sculptors, an amateur
musician as a member of quite a few choruses. I’m also inclined to say that I
have been an amateur philosopher, since, in spite of my a doctorate in that
subject, I did not exactly earn it—a long story. You might also include my role
as academic administrator; fair enough. But I shudder when I think of what a
professional administrator would be.
So
maybe I should stop claiming that I am a professional writer and just assert
that I am a proficient member of the species of writers.
No comments:
Post a Comment