It is now
virtually certain that Hillary Clinton will be the next president of the United
States. That prediction presumably comes true in four weeks. Just four weeks!
Even though I read a fair bit about US politics, I’ve seen nothing, neither
good advice or bad, about what is expected to happen next—after Clinton has
received the majority of electoral votes and become president elect. Nor have I
seen advice as to what she is to do during that period before being sworn in
and during her first months in office.
I
attribute this dual lack to the great limit of my reading (subjective) but also
to the fact that everyone is caught up in the Clinton-Trump pursuit of victory
on November 8 (objective).
But
what about the day after and during the four years after that? Isn’t it time to
comment about that future? There is a huge cluster of issues vastly more
important than the who said what to whom chit chat that is now prologue to the
election, with its outcome virtually foregone.
My first comment about this narrow focus
is the stuffy one that deplores the limited future of the views of the
punditry. The reply will surely be that we are journalists, with the job of writing and commenting about what is
going on now; we are neither historians, talking about how that came about, nor
is it our job to predict the future—as distinguished from telling us what the
polls and other current events portend about the future. Nor are we in the
business of advising what various actors should be doing tomorrow and the day after.
I
certainly have a lot of opinions about what Hillary Clinton should do when she
is president and I expect that I will make use of my blog to give expression to
them. For now, however, I will wait with the rest of commentators for the
confirmation that the United States will have, for the first time, a woman as
the country’s president.
No comments:
Post a Comment